Liberators

http://paper.li/Bunibroto/1309956977/2011/10/24

I am quoting BBC report of today, which says 

Libya's transitional government has declared national liberation before a jubilant crowd in Benghazi, where the revolt against Muammar Gaddafi began.

…Thousands of people were killed or injured after the violent repression of protests against Gaddafi's rule in February developed into a full-scale civil war.

NTC deputy head Abdul Hafez Ghoga announced from the stage that Libya had been freed, declaring: "Declaration of Liberation. Raise your head high. You are a free Libyan."

Thousands of voices echoed him chanting, "You are a free Libyan.".. Mr Abdul Jalil said the new Libya would take Islamic law as its foundation. Interest for bank loans would be capped, he said, and restrictions on the number of wives Libyan men could take would be lifted.

Winning leader of Bengal Ms.Banerji told after her win in recent Bengal election similar things.She said 'This is a complete victory of democracy, victory of Ma Matti Manush (mother, earth, people)... victory of exploited people, ordinary people, tribals... everybody supported us. This is a historic verdict. After 34 years, Bengal has got new freedom.' Incidentally Prime Minister of India was in Afganisthan who has also so got freedom few years back. “He has congratulated the people of Bengal” she told the roaring crowd. She saw similarity between freedom struggle of India against British and vowed to end “autocracy and atrocities”. Mamata said, This is the victory of the people against 35 years of  atrocities deprivation and oppression., leader mentioned. She said her party will bring democracy and will end “one party domination” in every sphere of life.” This win has come after long struggle & it was just like the freedom struggle”.

Just like Ms.Bannerjii compared her win with freedom struggle,I am taking pain to compare two freedom struggles of the recent past. Noticeably the winner of the freedom 150 days back has not commented upon new freedom of Libya 3 days back. She does not want comment as Gaddafi was Muslim and she does not hurt any Muslim as they are the pillars of her democracy.She does not make any comment on national issues where Muslims are involved.Neither she makes comments of Kashmir ,nor she comments on her own party MP & party members putting atrocities on people of Deganga. This was the principle of her democracy. Importantly the area she represented Loksabha these days was the area where Kashmir issue was the main talking point of the winning candidate  Dr.S.P Mukherji.She mentioned about one party rule where she was part of the one party Government at the center.Not only that,the “one” party had ruled most part of the 64 yer of Indian independence in comparison 34 years of rule in Bengal she was talking about..One wonders why this freedom was not mentioned when Morarji Desai or Atal Behari assumed power at the center. Moreover the same lack of democracy in Bengal ensured her victory repeatedly in Loksabha. She had not complained about lack of democracy in her constituency. Gaddafi hang on to power for 43 years. Left is shedding tears as he claimed to be socialist when he assumed power. They have seen lot of similarity in Gaddafi and Saddam Hussain.Most importantly they assume lot of similarity with Left’s preferred killer Stalin. History tells us the no autocrat will be able to beat the numbers of killing of Stalin.

There are lot of similarities from the people who liberated Libya from Gaddafi with the help of US dominated Nato forces and democracy loving leaders of Bengal.  Libya’s new leadership has already declared that it will be a Muslim country,while here they  always shed crocodile tears on Muslim. On the first week after liberation they have given recognition to 10000 Madrasas, the organization which does not follow education policy of India according HR department of India and propagates anti India feeling according to IB department of Home ministry. Gaddafi & Saddam both had supported international terrorism while Lefts had supported terrorism and separatism in Kashmir & Nepal. New “revolutionary” leader had taken active support of those terrorist on her way of bagging freedom. As a result of these the leader is having immense threat from the terrorist gropu she got support at the moment. She herself told in 2009 that Naxal attack costed 500 crores in Railways.DNA reported in in 15 September,2011 that “Mamata reduces railways cash reserve to Rs75 lakh from Rs13,431 crore”.So these freedom fighters only causes losses due to their own action. If one incurs so much loss before freedom what lies in the future is imminent..

So people who gets support militarily from outside to get freedom only destined to cause financial losses and gets threat from the powers they had supported. So I do not have any expectations from the freedom fighters of Libya as well as those of Bengal.

Communists should also understand that they have to modify their thinking as well. If killings by forces in Iraq and Libya is to be condemned then killing of their preferred leaders including Stalin has to be condemned as well.If you want to prove yourself as secular then you will not support only countries which promote the sentiments of building a Muslim country.If you support them then you will have to support people who want to make a Hindu country.